-
Final
HAR
LOU3
13 -
Final
HAR
LOU1
13 -
Final
LOU
SH0
9 -
Mar 26, 6 pm
BAL
LOU
-
Mar 28, 430 p
LOU
OTT
-
Mar 28, 6 pm
LOU
OTT
-
Apr 2, 6 pm
SH
LOU
-
Apr 4, 430 p
WEL
LOU
-
Apr 4, 6 pm
WEL
LOU
-
Apr 9, 430 p
LOU
BONSP
-
Apr 9, 6 pm
LOU
BONSP
-
Apr 11, 6 pm
LOU
TONG
-
Apr 16, 430 p
LOU
PIP
-
Apr 16, 6 pm
LOU
PIP
-
Apr 19, 3 pm
LOU
LAN
-
Apr 19, 430 p
LOU
LAN
-
Apr 22, 445 p
LOU
BV
-
Apr 25, 430 p
LOU
AC
-
Apr 25, 6 pm
LOU
AC
-
Apr 27, TBA
LOU
PV
-
Apr 27, TBA
LOU
CHA
-
Apr 30, 430 p
EUD
LOU
-
Apr 30, 6 pm
EUD
LOU
-
May 7, 430 pm
LOU
PAO
-
May 7, 6 pm
LOU
PAO
-
May 8, 5 pm
BL
LOU
-
Mar 25, 4 pm
FRON
LOU
-
Mar 25, 6 pm
FRON
LOU
-
Mar 26, 6 pm
BAL
LOU
-
Mar 28, 430 p
LOU
OTT
-
Mar 28, 6 pm
LOU
OTT
-
Apr 2, 430 p
SH
LOU
-
Apr 2, 6 pm
SH
LOU
-
Apr 4, 430 p
WEL
LOU
-
Apr 4, 6 pm
WEL
LOU
-
Apr 9, 430 p
LOU
BONSP
-
Apr 9, 6 pm
LOU
BONSP
-
Apr 11, 6 pm
LOU
TONG
-
Apr 16, 4 pm
LOU
MAC QUAD
-
Apr 16, 6 pm
LOU
MAC QUAD
-
Apr 18, 6 pm
LOU
BVW
-
Apr 23, 430 p
FS
LOU
-
Apr 23, 6 pm
FS
LOU
-
Apr 25, 430 p
PIP
LOU
-
Apr 25, 6 pm
PIP
LOU
-
Apr 30, 6 pm
EUD
LOU
-
May 3, 4 pm
LOU
LAN
-
May 3, 6 pm
LOU
LAN
-
May 4, 12 pm
LOU
CHA
-
May 7, 430 p
LOU
PAO
-
May 7, 6 pm
LOU
PAO
-
May 9, 6 pm
LOU
BAL
-
Final OT
LOU
LAN2
1 -
Final
LEAV
LOU1
2 -
Final
LOU
SA7
1 -
Final
LOU
TUR5
0 -
Mar 29, 630 p
LOU
SMN
-
Apr 1, 630 pm
AUG
LOU
-
Apr 4, 6 pm
SH
LOU
-
Apr 9, 6 pm
LOU
TONG
-
Apr 11, 4 pm
LOU
BAL
-
Apr 16, 6 pm
LOU
CHA
-
Apr 23, 6 pm
LOU
OTT
-
Apr 25, 6 pm
EUD
LOU
-
Apr 30, 6 pm
BL
LOU
-
May 2, 6 pm
LOU
BONSP
-
May 7, 6 pm
OTT
LOU
-
May 9, 6 pm
LAN
LOU
-
Final
BAL
LOU3
1 -
Final
LOU
OLW0
2 -
Final
LOU
DES0
2 -
Final
PIP
LOU2
1 -
Final
BUR
LOU0
2 -
Final
LOU
OTT2
3 -
Final
LOU
FRON INV1st
PL -
Final
LOU
BONSP3
0 -
Final
LOU
EUD0
3 -
Final
FS
LOU0
2 -
Final
GIR
LOU1
2 -
Final
LOU
LOU INV2nd
PL -
Final
PAO
LOU0
3 -
Final
LOU
SH0
3 -
Final
LOU
OTT INV1
4 -
Final
TONG
LOU1
3 -
Final
LOU
ATCH INV2nd
PL -
Final
WAM
LOU0
2 -
Final
OLN
LOU1
2
-
Final
TONG
LOU51
53 -
Final
LOU
BUR51
63 -
Final
AC
LOU37
44 -
Final
LOU
BAL42
60 -
Final
LOU
FRON57
46 -
Final
LOU
EUD46
53 -
Final OT
LOU
SH60
57 -
Final
BAL
LOU62
46 -
Final
NEK
LOU55
54 -
Final 2OT
GIR
LOU58
56 -
Final
LOU
WAM45
56 -
Final
BON
LOU45
53 -
Final
PAO
LOU16
47 -
Final
LEE
LOU71
46 -
Final
LOU
OTT52
62 -
Final
LOU
TONG45
40 -
Final
SH
LOU44
42 -
Final
EUD
LOU52
49 -
Final
LOU
PAO46
29 -
Final
HAR
LOU57
52
-
Final
TONG
LOU48
28 -
Final
LOU
BUR38
43 -
Final
AC
LOU35
31 -
Final
LOU
BAL23
42 -
Final
LOU
FRON48
55 -
Final
LOU
EUD37
56 -
Final
LOU
SH46
59 -
Final
BAL
LOU52
31 -
Final
NEK
LOU41
49 -
Final
CHA
LOU53
36 -
Final
GIR
LOU42
34 -
Final
LOU
WAM24
63 -
Final
BON
LOU35
40 -
Final
PAO
LOU38
42 -
Final
LOU
OTT29
45 -
Final
LOU
TONG40
39 -
Final
SH
LOU43
37 -
Final
EUD
LOU38
30 -
Final
LOU
PAO39
35 -
Final
HAR
LOU33
40
Lady Cats face three state-ranked teams in up and down week
- Updated: September 17, 2019
Louisburg junior Carleigh Pritchard and senior Liz Jacobs team up for a block Saturday during the Lansing Invitational.
It was an up and down week for the Louisburg volleyball team last week – one with started with two wins and ended with losses to three state-ranked teams.
During the Lansing Invitational on Saturday, the Lady Cats finished with a 1-3 record in a tournament that featured some of the state’s best teams.
Louisburg opened tournament play with a 25-23 and 25-9 victory over Shawnee Mission North behind five kills each from seniors Liz Jacobs and Haley Cain and senior Riley Kallevig added four.
The Lady Cats (5-5) also shined from behind the service line as they recorded 10 aces in the match, including five from sophomore Rinny McMullen and two from sophomore Davis Guetterman. McMullen also handed out 12 assists to lead the Lady Cats.
The schedule got much more difficult for Louisburg as they lost a pair of 2-0 matches to No. 6 Spring Hill and No. 3 Lansing, who are both ranked in Class 5A. The tournament ended with a 2-1 loss to Olathe West.
Louisburg was also a little short-handed as senior hitter Erin Lemke had to sit out with an injury
“Even though we went 1-3 on the day at Lansing, there were some bright moments throughout the day,” Louisburg coach Jessica Compliment said. “We struggled to find ‘our game’ and played that way all day. The Lansing tournament is loaded with great teams, and has always been one of our toughest tournaments we play in. We stayed with most of the teams throughout the day, but once it got to 15-14 or 16-14, they took off and finished, and we struggled to ‘play to win.’
“We became hesitant and played it safe rather than fighting back and playing to win. There were many instances throughout the tournament we were playing some great volleyball. Our back row had some great saves and our offense clicked well. As I told the team, we need to work on finding that drive, that motivation, that energy, and carry it throughout every set and every match.”
On Thursday, the Lady Cats hosted another state-ranked team in their home opener when they faced off with No. 5 Bonner Springs. Louisburg came up short in a 25-23, 25-19, 22-25 and 25-18 loss to the Braves.
It was a competitive match throughout, but the Braves were able to make several runs late in each set to pull away.
Cain led the attack at the net with 12 kills, Jacobs finished with nine and junior Alyse Moore added eight in the loss. McMullen and Guetterman ran the offense well with 22 and 19 assists, respectively, and Guetterman also added two aces.
Defensively, Kallevig paced the Lady Cats with 18 digs on the night and senior Reilly Ratliff-Becher finished with 13. Lemke and junior Carleigh Pritchard had two blocks each.
At the start of the week, the Lady Cats traveled to Santa Fe Trail for a triangular with Burlington. Louisburg left with a pair of easy wins.
The Lady Cats knocked off Burlington 25-8 and 25-14 and downed Santa Fe Trail 25-10 and 25-14.
“The team played well,” Compliment said. “They weren’t our cleanest matches this season, but our serving was tough, and we moved the ball around well. It was hard for us to maintain our pace throughout the evening, but we were able to get on some long runs where we were very efficient in both the front and back row.”
Everyone got involved in the win against Santa Fe Trail as Kallevig led the way with nine kills, while Lemke and Pritchard each finished with seven. Guetterman had three aces to lead Louisburg and Kallevig finished with two. Guetterman and McMullen also had 12 and 11 assists, respectively.
Defensively, sophomore Chase Kallevig had a team-high nine digs and Ratliff-Becher added seven.
Against Burlington, Pritchard had a team-high four kills in the match, but it was the serving that was the story of the match.
Louisburg tallied 11 aces against Burlington, including five from Guetterman and three from McMullen. The two sophomores also combined for 13 assists.
Louisburg returns to action with a pair of home duals this week, including a rematch with Spring Hill at 6:30 p.m. tonight.